Saturday, June 5, 2010
As my school counts down to its centennial
OK, boys and girls, let's pull our heads from the sand this morning. Let's un-stick our necks from the mud and see the world for what it is, not for what we wish it were. Here's shocking news from GMA News:
Four Philippine universities made it again to the Top 200 Asian universities list of consultancy Quacquarelli Symonds Ltd. (QS) for 2010, even as this is not really a cause for celebration in a country with about 2,000 institutions of higher education.
Leading the Philippine schools is the Jesuit-run Ateneo de Manila University, which tied Taiwan’s National Central University at the 58th spot. Ateneo rose from the 84th spot it occupied last year.
State-run University of the Philippines’ rank fell from 63 to 78, while University of Santo Tomas ranked 101st, an advance from its former 144th spot.
De la Salle University suffered the worst blow among the four Philippine universities, falling from the 76th spot to land at 106th.
In measuring quality, QS used the following criteria: Asian academic peers (30 percent), papers per faculty (15 percent), citations per paper (15 percent), student-faculty ratio (20 percent), Asian employer review (10 percent), international faculty (2.5 percent), international students (2.5 percent), inbound exchange students (2.5 percent), and outbound exchange students (2.5 percent). – (GMA News)
We Lasallians know in our hearts that La Salle is an excellent school, perhaps even the best educational institution in the Philippines. Not long ago, there were suggestions that La Salle was the best school in the Philippines, better even than U.P. Yet, as we count down to our centennial celebrations next year, we are besieged by reports that Asian academics no longer think highly of our school and, conversely, those same academics are becoming enamored of the Jesuit institution which is bent on throwing sand in our face.
What happened?
The report reprinted above presumably provides an explanation for why La Salle no longer scores as well as Ateneo in university rankings. Yet, from my perspective, the criteria used probably should favor La Salle. What is really going on?
I think there is widespread perception out there that La Salle does not produce the kind of graduates that Ateneo does. If you want to know about a school's quality, look at the graduates. This is how schools are generally rated. Harvard is considered the top school in the U.S. because its graduates are the leaders in most fields. Princeton graduates, Yale graduates, Columbia graduates, Stanford graduates, UC-Berkely graduates, etc. manage to rise to the top. Ergo, those are great schools.
Ateneo produces many of the country's leaders. Look at the Presidency. The last three Philippine presidents are products of Ateneo. National conversations and discourse are often led by graduates of Ateneo. The school is heavily and prominently represented in culture, science and - now - even in business. Lasallians have always been in command of the commercial world and this has become a problem. There is widespread perception that Lsallians are one-dimensional. That we are good business people and nothing much else. We are too busy making money or are just not interested in anything else - least of all being leaders in the country's drive to economic ascendancy.
We have ceded the high ground to Ateneo and U.P. And now, apparently, to U.S.T.
In La Salle's Internet circles the moderators have adopted the policy of non-engagement. If it's serious stuff, or controversial stuff, or politics, we are cautioned to stay away. We're just not interested. We will talk about the birthday parties we are going to attend, the chicks we will surround ourselves with, but we will not be caught commenting on the sad state of our country. We abhor serious topics, they are too "heavy" for our taste.
We do not want to speak out against the country's elite, who have mismanaged the country for close to a century, partly because we are the elite and partly because most of us are marketing men and women and therefore take pains to avoid the prospect of displeasing anyone.
People take potshots at us as society boys, gay boys, China, Inc. or conyo boys. If not for our women graduates, people would have an even lower opinion of us.
I am in the process of reading the celebrated novel, Ilustrado, by Miguel Syjuco. Miguel is a son of one of my classmates in La Salle-Taft, Augusto Syjuco, Jr. I think it's reasonable to assume that Miguel would speak of La Salle, his dad's alma mater, more favorably than he would of Ateneo. Never mind that Miguel actually grew up in Canada, where his family elected to wait out the Marcos years.
I was taken aback by a passage in Ilustrado:
And so it became a habit for Crispin and me to trade these well-worn classics, particularly the ones about our distinguished alma mater, writing them on slips of paper to pass like shibboleths when next we'd meet.
"These male students loiter around Shoe Mart Megamall," one note said. "One is from the exclusive Ateneo de Manila University. One from the rival De La Salle University. The third, named Erning Isip, is from the populist AMA Computer College. The three students spot a very pretty light skinned girl. Each of the boys takes a turn at trying to woo her. The Atenean says: 'Why, hello there. Perhaps I should text my driver to bring my BMW around to chauffeur us to the Polo Club so we can get some gindara?' The Lasallista says: 'Wow, you're so talagang pretty, as in totally ganda gorgeous. Are you hungry at all? Let's ride my CRV and I'll make libre fried chicken skin and Cuba libres at Dencio's bar and grill.' Erning Isip, the AMA Computer College student, timidly approaches the girl. Scratching the back of his head, he says: 'Miss, please, miss, give me autograph?' "
It is clear that Miguel has a low opinion of the school that his dad attended and grew up in.
I know the characterization of the Lasallista in Syjuco's Ilustrado is a stereotype and perhaps unfair. The problem I have, though, is that I've heard Lasallians (people from La Salle are no longer called Lasallistas) talk in Taglish. Whether most Lasallians talk in Taglish is not a conclusion I'm prepared to concede. But clearly Syjuco seems to think that at the very least Lasallians are less educated than Ateneans.
It is this widespread perception that we are fighting. It's an uphill climb. Ateneo has managed to convince Asian academics that it is far superior to La Salle and it will take years before La Salle can reclaim the top spotlight from its much-ballyhooed rival.
And so we've gone full circle. When La Salle started in 1911 with a little school in Paco, Manila, the high-flying Ateneo de Manila was already one of two premier educational institutions in the country, along with University of Santo Tomas. La Salle was just a dream, a gleam in the eyes of the Christian Brothers who first ventured in the only American colony in Asia. The University of the Philippines was only two years old.
Now, nearly 100 years later, La Salle is taking the back seat to the venerable Ateneo. While La Salle is going-away the better commercial success than Ateneo - we have 19 campuses nationwide, Ateneo has a mere handful - it is Ateneo that has claimed the highest rock in the country's academic circles. We are somewhere down below, on a lower rock, in the shadow of that big rock where the Lion King rests and roars and stares with bored eyes at the moon.
That La Salle has added a Law School is welcome news. The institution must produce lawyers who will someday lead the country. We must at some point produce a President or Prime Minister of the Philippines. We must graduate people who will someday have major roles in the country's nation-building.
Asian academics must become aware that we are not just a Computer Science School, or an engineering school, or an accounting, marketing, advertising or salesmanship school or a finishing school for call-center employees. They must perceive us as present and future leaders of the country.
Someday, we will retake the glory from our fierce rival. We are capable of doing that, I know, because we did it in the past. Not too long ago Asian academics - in fact, academics around the world - thought of La Salle as one of the top two schools in the country, along with the University of the Philippines. We did it before, we can do it again.
It's just sad that as we start the countdown to our centennial celebrations in June, 2011 we are playing second fiddle to the school that is making fun of the way we use the English language.
They also make fun of us in Latin.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
The survey measures "excellence" by several parameters including research (15% + 15%) and foreign participation. This probably does not conform to what many other people believe should constitute "excellence". At any rate, it is the University that is being assessed not our school.
ReplyDeleteAnyway, does it matter? What we were then is what we were and not what is there now.
I would judge excellence of a school by the maturity achieved by its alumni.
We were taunting Ateneans in La Salle-Ateneo basketball games a couple of years ago because we consistently outranked them. Ateneo then went on a years-long campaign to convince Asian academics that it is the premier institution in the Philippines.
ReplyDeleteLa Salle simply sat on its hands and let the chips fall where they may. The result is that we have lost bragging rights to our fiercest competitor.
Lasallians are perceived as "elitistas," but the DLSU administration cannot afford to be "above it all." If the fight is in the gutter, they must be willing to go to the gutter and win this thing. The school's brain trust cannot afford to walk away from this fight. They owe it to us, the alumni.
We want those bragging rights back.
From Frederick Kairuz by email:
ReplyDeleteI beleive during the heydays, the Christian brothers mostly foreign were conservatives whose goal was education..now we have a majority of filipino Christian brothers who are so political and liberal
..my humble opinion...could be wrong.....
From Cita Garcia by email:
ReplyDeleteHi Cesar,
It is a nice artcle , I read it and at several paragraphs, I could not help but smile. Like that part about the syjucos. boyboy syjuco was a close firend when he run as constitutional delegate. It was at that time that he was losing and he asked me to see what is happning in malabon. I had my date with my boyfriend, and I had to break our date. that night my boyfirend met an accident were he lost his one eye. I am still married to him, but I always blame Boboy for having to marry my husband. ( no regrets). I lived near Ateneo, and my only son is an Atenean.
there is a joke that goes like this" Sa ateneo ang hirap ng Science at math, sa Lasalle ang hirap ng Parking."
From Ray Torrecarion by email:
ReplyDeleteMy take on this is that Ateneo is the older institution, as is UST, and so with UP. La Salle is but 100 yrs old this year. For a young 100 years we can hold our own. By just sheer mathematics, the older schools have had the time to produce more renowned graduates. The question is whether our school has prepared us for dealing with life and the challenges it presents.
Should not how well an Educational Institution prepare it's student beyond undergraduate degrees, and for life in general, be a judge of its worth as an institution of higher learning. The numbers and the stats quoted for the ranking crteria can be impressive, but I say, look beyond that.
Look to your fellow La Salltes and see what lives they live, what values they hold, and have passed on to their children. How many are active in civic and church organization. We do not have to look far to realized many La Sallites have it all, not in wealth, or renown, but by the way they live as an example of their education and upbringing, of their values, gleaned in many cases from La Salle.
So I will hold my head high as a La Salle graduate. With the number of our ex-pat grads who have been "successful" aboard and holding down professional positions, that demonstrates that La Salle has prepared us well. I can say that my college class of 72 has many of our graduates who went on to Master's degrees and professional positions here in the States and other places abroad.
Eng 72 has postgraduates from Harvard, Mass Inst. of Tech, Stanford, Cal Berkley, UCLA, Syracuse University (the few I know of), where these undergraduates went to get MBA's or Engineering Masters.
I would welcome a breakdown of how many undergraduate La Sallians hold foreign graduate degrees, I do not see that as a statistic for the ranking criteria stated. Or how many La Sallites regardless of stature are examples of a left well lived.
I will pit my education and skills against any of the foreign school undergraduates, even postgraduates. But La Salle has one big distinction, La Salle is just not academics, but character building with strong Catholic values. Many secular school grads can have the knowledge, but have not derived strong values from their education.
How many Harvard, Princeton, etc grads here in the states hold high government and industrial positions, but are as unethical, nay corrupt, as the worse of this society. How many are people whose personal life is far from stellar. Education without a moral compass provides no clear path to a higher plane of being. Be proud fellow La Salle grads, we can hold our own with the best, and then some.
Ray Torrecarion, Taft HS 67; DLSC Eng '72
La Sallite from San Diego
From pyu by email:
ReplyDeleteAt the end of the day, irregardless of rankings, if we have the money to choose any school in the Philippines, will we still send our kids to La Salle? My own answer is YES and I feel that 99% of my co-alumni would say the same. I've been to the mountaintop too regarding schools in the USA, and yes, we can hold our own.
From Tom Manning by email:
ReplyDeleteAfter reading through the criteria they have used, I have no doubt that Ateneo and UP will be prominent! So for such criteria, I give it to them!
It has no bearing on my view of La Salle!
Tom Q Manning
From Ramon Franco by email:
ReplyDeleteHi Chay,
I could not agree more on what he says. Absolutely right, 100%. Furthermore, who cares about the numbers anyway. It is only good for one thing only, marketing. To draw in more stupid people with plenty of money and charge them a fortune. It only proves that one is good in exam questions, but in real life? Like you say, they are relative values only, not absolute and may I add, do not prove anything. There is no correlation between academic excellence and being a good person and solving the ills of society. Surveys of this nature are highly suspect not only in methodology but in purpose and objectivity.
For if these surveys prove any usefulness, than why is the world in a mess today. Whether in politics or business? We have more highly educated (i.e. coming from "prestigious" schools) people than at any time in history and yet the world is a mess. The more "Smart" people we have the worst we are. Just look at how many people from Harvard MBA programs are in Wall Street and yet all it has developed are smart crooks (my opinion). Or in politics, the same. How many people in high positions of power come from the so called best schools, no matter what country, yet we are still fighting one another. The political so called elites are infested with graduates from the "best" schools whether from Harvard, La Salle, or Ateneo or what have you anywhere in the world and what do we have? More problems.
In the end it really does not matter as he says below where one went to school. It is what one makes of himself and who one is, good or bad that really determines the future of the world, whether we leave this world a better place than we found it or worst. What values have they learned and practised in their lives.
At the rate we are turning out graduates from this prestigious schools and infesting them in business and politics the worst it becomes and we will leave this place worst off than when we found it and I am not talking from a materialistic point of view only. I cannot say if today La Salle is doing better or worst than when we were there. We only need to look at the results and my information is weak on this point. But as he says there are many La Salle graduates in the past who have done well in other institutions around the world, like Harvard or Yale or like the Universities in Sydney where I got my MBA and my post graduate in computers. This alone is enough to say that La Salle gave us a good educational foundation to partake in higher studies. But that is all it is good for.
All the best,
Ramon
From Tom Manning by email:
ReplyDeleteI think i have to reiterate what I said. With what criteria they used to measure universities, we are probably not at par. But that was never what La Salle has stood for! La Salle is an institution that produces well-rounded individuals who are prepared for the world around them. That particular criteria is not used to measure universities.
I have learned to accept my own weaknesses as well as my strengths. I find this to be the same for my view of La Salle. It is never perfect! The system has its strengths and its weaknesses, no doubt about this. Though its students are not the most academically inclined, they are prepared for the life out there. And this means in any country, in any industry, in any challenge that they may face.
Hence, I will not be convinced to change my views about La Salle, ranking or no ranking!
Animo La Salle!!!
From Nello Garcia by email:
ReplyDeleteI agree with Tom. It's enough that we know who we are and are comfortable with that. Our Alma Mater has helped shape us into who we are, and in the final analysis, all that's really important is that we are Christian gentlemen who live the Gospel, as Bro. Bernie used to say to our kids in LSGH.
Ranking us #4 or whatever is immaterial if we do not believe in the standard used for ranking. Does DLSU believe that the standard is meaningful enough to merit its participation? So far, it has not. La Salle's performance is not determined by its participation in the study. Frankly, the ranking is higher if a school pays the "entrance fee".
The issue of competition in sports is irrelevant - if we don't choose to compete, our ranking doesn't matter. It's like being blacklisted by a tournament that we decide not to compete in. For La Salle, the ranking isn't the end-all or be-all of education - we are. We matter, and how we can help our fellow Filipinos and our country by being here and contributing is what really matters.
Who really cares about the ranking? If DLSU doesn't care about the standard, why should it matter to us?
My response to Tom and Nello:
ReplyDeleteWhen the rankings first came out in 2005, Lasallians all over the world delighted in needling their Atenean friends about Ateneo's third place finish. I remember watching a La Salle-Ateneo basketball game in 2005 on the ANC channel which featured "74" placards in the La Salle cheering section. The La Salle student body was skewering Ateneans for that school's 74th place finish in the first THES - QS rankings, which assigned La Salle in the 50s and UP in the 40s.
We as a school got a lot of mileage out of the first rankings and gave out a lot of hoots and whistles at the expense of Ateneo.
Now that the situation is reversed - Ateneo is ranked first while La Salle is fourth at No. 106, all of a sudden Lasallians don't care about the rankings? I am willing to grant that Tom and Nello never cared about the rankings - even when La Salle was rated higher than Ateneo. But I can't believe that most Lasallians did not care. I just don't remember that to be the case then.
Our feet did not touch the ground as we walked past Ateneans we knew.
Cesar L
Just to share, this is the official statement of DLSU regarding this issue:
ReplyDeleteDLSU Statement on the 2010 Asian University Rankings
De La Salle University acknowledges the value of different surveys that rank academic institutions using various criteria. These appraisals allow us to view the institution from different perspectives. However, DLSU will not engage in the active participation of such surveys, as questions on survey reliability and credibility are yet to be answered. DLSU’s priority is its mission of serving as a resource for Church and Nation, focused on academic excellence and holistic development of the youth under its care.
Hi, I just happened to see your blog and I couldn’t help but comment. Please let me share with you three things I want to point out regarding this year’s THES-QS rankings, and allow me to identify and briefly discuss each one:
ReplyDelete1. Credibility issue – In the past few years that THES-QS ranked universities around the world, there has always been much debate as to how they came up with their results. But it should interest you to know that the QS rankings is definitely not flawless, as you will understand from this page: http://rankingwatch.blogspot.com/2008_06_01_archive.html Please read the June 24, 2008 post of this particular blog, and you will understand why the rankings made by QS remain under scrutiny.
2. Abrupt changes in the rankings – I must confess that I have been following this story since two years ago, being an alumna of La Salle myself. When I saw that the ranking of La Salle fell significantly from 2008-2009, I was confused. How can La Salle drop more than 20 universities behind when it has not undergone any significant change in one year that would merit a big fall like that? From that strange flux alone, I concluded that the results are still debatable.
3. Perception game – From what you said yourself, the rankings is a perception game. It doesn’t matter how well the university did in research or how it helps in the development and progress of its host nation. It’s all about perception. I would think that La Salle, being an academic institution of higher learning, did not want to go down that route because it believes that it can do so much more than just alter perceptions—it can actually provide quality education, produce groundbreaking research, and serve as a resource for our country.
So there. I hope with this I was able to give you and your readers a bit more information about the rankings. I, too, love La Salle, and I also don’t want for anyone to just degrade my beloved university. But at the same time, I understand why La Salle is taking the higher route on this one. I hope you understand it, too.
No doubt why Ateneo got that slot. they deserve it anyway. nice post..i enjoyed reading the content.
ReplyDelete