At least Manila can dry out and the low-lying areas can watch the waters slowly recede and people who were rendered homeless and others who lost the contents of their homes can start rebuilding their lives.
As bad as the devastation and loss of lives were that Ondoy has wrought, it was merely a warning to all Filipinos that there may be worse times ahead.
My greatest fear is that people will go back to their daily routines, shrug off Ondoy as an act of God, pray hard that a similar calamity does not befall the Philippines in the future and do same-old, same-old. That would be a huge, unforgivable mistake.
Are there lessons to be learned from Ondoy? The obvious answer is yes. But what if there are lessons, are we as a people ever guided by lessons learned from calamities?
There is a picture that best embodies the fate of metro Manila in the foreseeable future. It is one of those pictures that have gone around the world on the Internet. It shows Manilans on top of a bridge with nothing but water ahead of them. To me, it is a metaphor for Manila's long-term destiny. Having left the great flood behind, Manilans look to a future of flooded streets, cars and houses. Manila's destiny has already been written, and it is written with an ocean of ink the color of mud and muck.
You may argue as many responsible and respected commentators have that global warming is a natural, long-term trend that is not caused by the actions of mankind. But if your sanity is intact, it will be hard to argue against the near-unanimous scientific community judgment that, caused by man or not, there is indeed global warming. The likelihood that there will be more violent, severe and record-setting storms hitting the Philippines and the Pacific rim countries has been predicted by many leading scientists in the world. We can ignore the scientific Cassandras only at our peril. Not us, perhaps, for many of us are not going to be around, but our children and their children and future generations of Filipinos not yet born.
The Philippines is in the bulls eye of every scenario created by global warming scientists. According to these scenarios, the rising oceans will sink large areas of metro Manila and many streets in the capital will look like Venetian canals. If it's any consolation to Filipinos, that will happen to some sections of lower Manhattan also.
And, if the rising ocean waters do not devastate Manila, the monster storms that are being predicted for the future will complete the job.
If the myriad of pictures posted on the Internet over the past week are enough to discourage and dishearten most Filipinos in the global community, imagine the effect of not one Ondoy a year but three or four such storms hitting Manila each year.
Filipinos cannot afford to brush off Ondoy and eventually go back to the usual hustle and bustle of their everyday lives. Ondoy must change their mindset and challenge them to confront a future that promises to be more frightening than they have ever experienced or imagined.
There is another picture that is going around cyberspace which is a microcosm of the dangers faced by Manilans from future floods, fierce winds and rampaging currents. It is the picture of a boy being hoisted by rescue volunteers and workers to the top of a roof. It is a metaphor for an existence where the only protection against the elements is on top of a roof. Perhaps like me, most are wondering how people were able to clamber up on the roofs of their or their neighbors' houses. Rescue volunteers hoisting people up to rooftops is one way. Another is by letting the rising waters take them up to the roofs of their homes.
WE MUST LEARN FROM THE DUTCH AND, YES, NEW ORLEANS
Filipinos must re-do the infrastructure of metro Manila in ways that as recently as September 25, people in the Philippines did not consider possible. They must do this, if today's children want to continuously live in Metro Manila and celebrate their 60th birthdays.
Something drastic must be done. Whatever the government and private industry do, if it's not drastic, it will not be enough.
A lot of recommendations have been made on how to assure proper drainage in low-lying areas of metro Manila, some dating as early as the 1970s, but Filipinos have not had the will and the funds to entertain such ideas.
The government may have the will now, but will there be funds for these most logical of all logical projects? There are some obvious "found money" lying around, but more on this later.
The obvious projects that are waiting to be matched by strong-willed Filipinos are:
1. Dredging of esteros, streams and rivers in and around Manila and topping off the esteros with concrete. This will increase the capacity of the esteros to accommodate rain water and sewage. It will also assure that people who live along such natural and man-made sewer systems are prevented from using them as garbage dumps.
2. Erection of levees along Pasig and Marikina rivers. Not the whole stretch of the rivers, but in spots where the rivers are likely to overflow their banks. We must learn from New Orleans, the Dutch and Europe's other Low Countries. It will be very expensive, but it is an expense that shall be worth the cost because such a massive undertaking will employ tens of thousands of people and the effect on local economies will be huge.
3. Creation of floodgates that will release water from Laguna de Bay to Manila Bay during heavy storms. This is another labor-intensive project that can have a huge impact on the economies of Cavite and Laguna.
4. Relocation of residents of squatter areas in low-lying communities to higher ground and dumping of dredged mud and muck to raise ground levels in those areas.
5. Pass a law requiring municipalities in low-lying areas and near rivers and streams to equip themselves with a sufficient number of lifeboats for search and rescue missions. If the municipalities are unwilling to do this, the law shall mandate that those areas must be permanently evacuated.
6. Clean up the BIR and Customs to increase tax revenues. Pass additional tax laws. Businesses and residents who operate and live in communities that stand to benefit from the new infrastructure will be assessed special taxes for as long as the new infrastructure is under construction.
7. Create government-sponsored flood insurance policies. Residences and commercial properties in municipalities that are located in the most flood-prone areas will command the steepest insurance premiums.
Now for the obvious question: Since the additional taxes and more efficient tax collections will not be enough to finance the new and renovated infrastructure, how will the Philippines finance all these ambitious projects? I will devote my next post to a discussion of how the money can be raised.
Meanwhile, we must all get used to thinking as one nation. If all Filipinos help Manila as one nation, one country, it may yet be the spark that finally starts us on the road to thinking as a country and not as families, clans, provinces and regions.
The rebuild-Manila project, if done by all Filipinos, can be the start of that change in mindset that every Filipino knows in their heart we all need but that we have assumed all along is an impossible dream. If we can only think as one nation as the Americans, the British, the French, the Germans, the Japanese, Koreans, Chinese, Sngaporeans and now the Indians do, we can start rebuilding Manila. Then we can rebuild Subic, Cebu, Zamboanga, Davao and other urban centers all around the archipelago.
We shall be able to do it because we will have the will and the mindset.
(Continued next week)
From Chibu Lagman:
ReplyDeleteChay,
Just keep blogging away. I read your stuff even if I don't respond to them.
Take care.
Chib
(Chib is a professor of Latin American Studies at the University of Alberta in Alberta, Canada.)
From Hery Brillantes:
ReplyDeleteCesar,
Keep blogging! I'm enthusiastically reading, heartily laughing, confusingly chuckling and seriously frowning.
I enjoy reading your blogs as much as Paul Krugman's.
Hery
Sent via BlackBerry by AT&T
Thanks for the vote of confidence, Chibu and Hery. As far as the comparison to Paul Krugman, that is quite a stretch. Krugman is unique and untouchable. He is a god to me.
ReplyDeleteFrom VP (Vox Populi):
ReplyDeleteCesar, nice blogs. I enjoyed reading them. I'm not sure if you have heard of the Philippine Blog Awards but you may want to enter your blogs for nomination. Here's the link - www.philippineblogawards.com.ph
VP
VP,
ReplyDeleteThanks for the tip. It's something to think about.
Cesar
From Tony Nievera:
ReplyDeleteI would leave the design for better flood control in Manila to the experts. Your suggestion1 is a no brainer to dredge and clean all waterways and esteros. But it could mean getting rid of many squatters homw right on the esteros and demolishing structures of people who land grabbed river and creek banks.
2. Levees need to almost continuous to work, and let the experts design one. 3. There is no need for flood gates for the lake, what is needed is drainage water way to flow out to the sea. The mangahan way was built to divert flow from the marikina river to the lake, the concept was to raise the level of the lake to absorb flash surges and eventually flow out to Manila Bay, I wonder if they completed the drainage thru Paranaque. Flood gates are in London, Venice to prevent storm surges from coming from the sea and flooding the river. The situation in Manila is to get rid of the water by letting it flow to the sea. There is a need for an integrated flood control system that must be designed by hydraulics type experts and not by urban planners who think of limiting use of flood prone areas as solution. My two cents.
Sent via BlackBerry from T-Mobile
From Frank Jimenez:
ReplyDeleteThat's right Tony. Leave it to the experts -
especially to the Dutch, Belgian and Venetian
engineers who have been contending with
horrendous drainage problems in their countries
for hundreds of years. But if Filipinos, because
of their habits of breaking zoning laws and
regulations, would continue with that culture,
no experts could really solve their problems.
I have seen the last time I went home to
Paranaque - they virtually used Paranaque
River as a garbage dump; the run-off canals
in Merville, Better Living, BF Homes, etc., are
also used as garbage dumps both by home-
owners and squatters alike. I guess they
expect the town to clean after them.
Frank J.