Atlas Shrugged

The 1970s and early 80s were a fog to me. I'm sure I heard a lot of memorable songs in the 70s but I just can't remember them. If I hear a good song from my past, I'm sure I will have some precious recollection of it, but I wouldn't know it was from the 70s unless someone told me. Or any of the songs in the early 80s.

Those were my dark days.

It was also a time in my life when I refused to read any books other than my textbooks in my MBA courses at Seattle University and books I needed to be familiar with to advance my career.

That was in all likelihood the real explanation for my refusal to read both "The Fountainhead" and "Atlas Shrugged," by Ayn Rand. I remember my first wife raving about both books, "Atlas Shrugged" in particular. In other words, I did not refuse to read the books just because my first wife had recommended them.

But I'm glad I did not read Ayn Rand and did not become one of her disciples.

The most famous disciple of Rand is Alan Greenspan, the former Fed Chairman, the one whom current Chairman Ben Bernanke succeeded.

Greenspan was the primary architect of the second golden age of America, he was also one of the major civil engineers of the economic collapse of the U.S.

You see, Ayn Rand taught that the best minds in society must be given absolute freedom in their pursuit of profit. Through her philosophy of Objectivism, Rand thought that such talented people would always spearhead society's march towards economic greatness through rational and superior thinking. Through objective and rational thinking, such people would always come up with the best solutions to social and economic problems.

Rand theorized that if the best minds in society went on strike and all retreated to a mountain retreat, the world would collapse. She felt that the best and most talented supported the world, just as the legendary Atlas carried the world on his shoulders and back. And if Atlas balked, or refused to carry the world any longer (shrugged), the world would simply collapse and even implode.

The world therefore owed its life, its existence to those best and brightest minds. Such people must be given absolute freedom to do their work, unfettered by government rules that tend to restrict their activities.

The unsuspecting Rand, then later Greenspan, never imagined the world they would help create.

Greed and excess eventually did the Randian philosophy in.

I read about Derek Jeter's history-making 2722nd hit as a Yankee, eclipsing the record set by Lou Gehrig seventy years ago and forever identifying him as the one who broke the great Gehrig's record. Someday, Jeter may be surpassed by someone else, but it will probably take decades, not years before such a feat happens. Jeter is one superstar who deserves all the accolades he has received in his baseball career.

There are some who like Jeter are deserving of all the hosannas and wealth that society has showered on them, such as Michael Jordan, Roger Federer, Tiger Woods, Michael Phelps, Lance Armstrong and others too many to list, but mainly the superstars of today have overblown accomplishments and certainly not deserving of society's long-term goo-goo eyes.

This, after all, is the age of the overcompensated, overweight "pillars" of society. The CEOs of today's major corporations now make 300 times what the average workers in their respective companies make. In the 1950s and 1960s, when America became far and away the major economic superpower in the world, the CEOs made 12 to 20 times what the average workers in their respective companies made.

How did the CEOs finagle such huge salaries, stock options and other forms of extra compensation for themselves? By closing American plants and relocating their manufacturing in third-world countries. The CEOs managed to increase profitability of their global operations by firing American workers and hiring workers in other countries.

Every thousand-block of American workers fired meant an uptick in the price of a company's shares in the New York Stock Exchange. For such upticks, the CEOs were rewarded with compensation previously reserved only for Eastern potentates.

The banks, investment and insurance companies made a compact. They would sell each other's products so that banks, insurance and investment companies would no longer be distinguishable. All of them would now be known as "financials."

The geniuses in the financial world created mortgage-backed securities and credit swaps that were responsible for the recent subprime mortgage crisis and the recent meltdown in the world economy.

"What?!" Greenspan exclaimed. "The meltdown occurred not as a result of the best and brightest minds going on strike (as in Atlas Shrugged) but because those best and brightest minds did a job on the world economy?" (Quotes from Greenspan were invented by me.)

The U.S. government seemingly was in on the whole farce and charade. From Reagan and Bush, Sr. looking the other way while Japanese manufacturers illegally dumped televisions and other electronic products in the U.S. market to kill American brands like RCA, Zenith, Magnavox and others, to Clinton hurriedly pushing through Nafta, which as Ross Perot had warned would create "a giant sucking sound" of American jobs being lost to Canada and Mexico, to George Bush, who did not see anything wrong with China taking over virtually all manufacturing functions in the U.S. in exchange for China buying up U.S. Treasuries which financed the Iraq War, the true war on terror, the tax cuts for the rich.

Because of the work of the best and brightest minds - not because those minds had gone on strike, as "Atlas Shrugged" had envisioned - the U.S. is now a basket case, whose problems are more gargantuan and worse than the problems faced by third-world countries like the Philippines.

Most people in the Philippines are used to having nothing. Americans are drifting because their assets have shrunk in value and even their most sacred possession, the embodiment of the American dream - now has a negative value. Many unemployed Americans have exhausted their savings as they wait for the employment picture to show some improvement. As though their lost jobs would ever come back.

There is a looming crisis in commercial real estate in this country, expected to peak as the meltdown in residential real estate is arrested and abated. The showcase for this topsy-turvy world of commercial real estate is the $11 billion City Center project in Las Vegas, the biggest privately-funded real estate development in the U.S. The geniuses who dreamed up this project never imagined that the decade-long boom in Vegas real estate would ever end. This, despite the fact that real estate booms don't last very long and are always followed by busts.

The new U.S. jobs that President Obama promised would be created in the alternative energy industry - what are the chances that such jobs will materialize? China and Europe are so far ahead of the U.S. in alternative energy they see us now as the poachers and not the other way around, which it should be since the alternative energy technology was an American invention.

The best and brightest minds are locked in the struggle between good and evil, between the haves and have-nots, between pure capitalists and the so-called socialists. Very little is being done in partnership. One side opposes what the other side proposes, as if by gut reaction.

The overarching debate on who should bail out the country, however, has recently been settled. It is the American middle class. Once again, the middle class is called upon to rescue the group of prodigal sons and daughters who might be exactly the people that Ayn Rand thought were the pillars of society, the Atlas that carried the world on his shoulders and back.

The middle class has already rescued the banks, the insurance companies, GM and Chrysler. They suspect that they are being asked to rescue the American health care system from eventual bankruptcy. They feel that they and their children are eventually going to be hit hard when the tax man comes a-calling to pay for the trillions in deficits that government has been incurring in record pace.

No, Ayn Rand, was wrong. The real Atlas in American society is not the best and brightest minds. It is the middle class. And recently that real Atlas has shrugged.

It has shrugged on the airwaves, in street demonstrations, in so-called town hall meetings across the country. They're mad as hell, they can't take it anymore.

If they would just drop the racist attacks on Obama, and if they would buck those who have seized on their angst to promote the crazy-quilt of right-wing causes, the rest of the country would take them more seriously.

Have Gun, Will Travel

I knew that I eventually would be curious enough to attend a gun show at some point. I have all my life been anti-gun, the kind that the NRA (National Rifle Association) despises, and if I were a politician, the NRA would be able to raise millions in a heart beat to defeat my candidacy.

It started as a curiosity, a willingness to look at things from the perspective of the other side, and an evolution in my own perspective as I drove many times over interstate highway 15 on that stretch of highway in California's Death Valley.

Death Valley gives me the creeps. I saw the movie "The Hills Have Eyes." The movie tells of grotesque, disease-ridden inhabitants of hills overlooking a desert highway who prey on people who had car breakdowns. Instead of helping such people in their hour of need, the hill mutants and monsters harrass, torture and kill and/or rape the hapless motorists and their families.

Once in a while I would catch myself thinking of and fearing the possibility of a car breakdown and being stranded and helpless in the darkness and eerie isolation of highway 15's shoulders. The traffic that alternates between heavy and nearly non-existent on I-15 - the artery that links Los Angeles and Las Vegas - is the only deterrent against ill-intentioned motorists who might stop to seemingly help us, but whose true agenda is to rob us and perhaps even harm us, especially my wife and son, who would be the most vulnerable.

This is my biggest fear each time I hop on my car and drive my family to LA to see to our daughter's needs in downtown LA. Natasha is on the last leg of her course in Fashion and Merchandising Design at the Fashion Institute of Design and Merchandising in LA. So hopefully, our trips to LA will be much less frequent in the future.

But the thought that the creepy dangers of Death Valley will soon be in my rear-view mirror has not dissuaded me from becoming, for a first time in my life, a gun lover. This immediate past summer, I have been subjected to images of monsters of a different kind: right-wing lunatic fringe gun-toters who pack their sidearms and menacingly picket the health care reform rallies of Democrats and even those of President Obama's. I could see myself attending one of those health care rallies and being confronted by a wacko shoving a gun at my face.

It has become perfectly clear to me that U.S. politics have become risky business; the grim reality is that such events represent a clear and present danger to one's health, one's life.

It happened over a long period of time, but now, finally, I can see why the NRA is right in saying that if guns are outlawed, only the outlaws and the creeps will have guns. By all means, if conservatives feel the need to own and carry guns, liberals must feel that need more - because nearly all conservatives have guns.

And so, I have decided to own a gun, finally, and to attend training sessions that will teach me how to use a gun and how to keep it out of reach of my ten-year-old son. I wish I could buy a smart gun, one that can be fired only by me. This would assure that no one in my household will be able to use it and accidentally shoot someone, or maybe even harm themselves.

At the recent gun show in Las Vegas - Sept. 5-6 in Cashman Center - there spread out on rows upon rows of tables were a vast collection of firearms, enough to supply a small army. Las Vegas has the distinction of putting on the biggest gun shows in the U.S., and that show was huge.

What do hunting knives and military apparel have to do with guns? It is obvious that there is a segment of the population that believes, deep in their hearts, that there are enemies in the U.S. who must be repelled. Are these your neighbors? Are they the Mob? Are they the rogue elements in the local police? Or are they the ruthless conspirators in the U.S. government?

It really doesn't matter who those bogeymen (and women) are; as far as the gun-toting crowd is concerned, they're all out there, ready to create mayhem, and who are probably being prevented from moving in on the squeaky-clean NRA members only by those members' arsenals.

In the paranoid logic of the ultra-conservative mind, the main convincing argument against the adventurism of society's bad elements - allegedly including but not limited to the Federal government - is the ready availability of lethal weapons in the U.S., especially the still-wild west. I saw the Barrett-99 50 caliber sniper rifle that has a range of 1 mile. This is reputedly one of the favorite rifles of rooftop and hotel room snipers who presumably are being contracted to eliminate high value targets. Just like in the movies.

It is also presumably used by the military to decommission vehicles that may contain explosives and are heading for a military outpost in Iraq, Afghanistan or some hot spot around the world.

All sorts of rifles and handguns - new and used - were on display. In the middle of this vortex of potential violence sat Wyatt Earp III, the grandson of the famed lawman Wyatt Earp. He showed me his favorite six-shooter, a gleaming nickel-plated 38 caliber that he uses in competitions. He claims to be the fastest draw in the world.

Since I've never owned a gun, my friends and the salesmen at the Gun Show have recommended that I buy a starter gun. The gun that most enthusiasts consider as a "starter" is the 9 mm. There are good 9 mm Luger, Millennium and Smith and Wesson, all in the price range of $300 to $400 brand new. Used ones can be had for $150. I wouldn't recommend the used ones because one never knows if they will always fire properly, get jammed, or worse, explode in the user's face.

I like the Smith and Wesson best, because of the feel of that gun, and because it closely resembles the Glock 9 mm, whose design S & W reportedly copied, under license from Glock.

Did I actually buy a gun at the Gun Show? What do you think?

Lotsa Vegas

My wife just got back from a trip to Budapest, Vienna and finally Venice. Budapest was where she and her sister attended a trade show, Vienna was where they imbibed the European culture and Venice was where they fell in love with a city. I hope to write a blog about this trip and the t-shirts I got out of it in the future.

Meanwhile, I was stuck in Vegas. What does a guy do in Vegas when the wife is away for two weeks? I know what you're thinking. Perish the thought, my ten-year-0ld son Paul was with me. Plus, my grown-up daughter and her boyfriend were staying with us and from time to time I had to cook and clean the swimming pool for them. Mainly I cooked stuff that can be deep-fried, but I also managed to cook the world-famous Philippine adobo and bulalo.

I got my daughter and her beau tickets to the Andrew Dice Clay show and the Bobby Slayton show and Sin City Comedy. My Chinese-looking daughter had a swell time at the ADC show as she was pummeled, skewered, ridiculed by the comedian, who targets minorities and is especially fond of the Chinese. He is the contemporary Don Rickles. For the younger ones, the mainly retired Don Rickles has been ridiculing his audience for decades and gets paid handsomely for doing so. It is a badge of honor to be insulted by Don Rickles.

They wanted to see more shows but my wife was coming back and it was my turn to watch a few shows. I got tickets to the Blue Man Group, the Barry Manilow "Ultimate Manilow" show and Defending the Caveman.

The wife had seen the Blue Man Group, so I took ten-year-old Paul with me and the two of us were treated to a unique form of entertainment. The three-man group converted everything they touched to drums, threw food at each other and caught the food with their mouths, played pantomimic comedy skits with two people from the audience, played drummers to a rock band that appeared to be Guitar Hero figures. It was all Vegas, baby.

Barry Manilow sang his hits from the 70s to the 90s and sitting there in the audience, one couldn't help being amazed at how many hits Manilow has treated the world to over the years. It was one Manilow hit after another, literally a walk down the boulevard of memories. People I'm sure disagree with me, but I think he sings better now than he did when he was much younger. His voice is fuller (though his lungs are noticeably weaker) and he sings with more emotion.

He sang "Mandy" with a video of his Mandy performance in 1975 showing in the background. The 1975 Manilow was a kid singing with technical precision, a higher pitched voice and award-winning composure, but the Manilow on the Las Vegas Hilton stage displayed all the emotions of one who had known Mandy for many, many years. He sang with nostalgia - the Greeks define nostalgia literally as tweaking strings in one's heart - and with conviction that if he had to do it all over again, he would do it exactly as he had.

He ended with a Broadway-style production of Copa Cabana.

The biggest surprise was Defending the Caveman in the Excalibur Casino. I all along had thought that the actors were those who regularly appear in the Geico commercials. So I was somewhat disappointed when I saw that the main dude - the only dude - was a regular white guy with a shaved head. Not at all looking like the cool Cavemen who appear on those Geico commercials.

Also, the guy talked and talked and it became clear that this was going to be one of those long monologues.

As the guy - Chris Mayse - warmed up to the audience and the audience warmed up to him, he hit his stride and we the audience started eating out of his hands.

With devastating accuracy, he explained why men are different from women. I always wondered, for example, why I tire so easily whenever I'm in Macy's, Wal-Mart or any department store, or any shopping mall. Chris explained that because we men are hunters, we go to stores only to hunt for the things that we actually need. We can't spend any more time in a department store or a mall than we actually need to find what we are hunting for. Once we find it, then the hunt is over and we have to go on to the next hunt.

Women are gatherers, so they enjoy gathering things, just in case they might need them. This is why women love to go shopping.

Chris Mayse explains the many cultural differences between the sexes in a hilarious, hysterical way. It's laugh a minute with him.

Defending the Caveman is showing in the Excalibur Hotel and Casino, a huge cavernous gambling mecca where you could get lost if you did not ask an employee for directions. Excalibur was teeming with the usual Labor Day weekend crowd, though it was not as full as the Venetian, which was like Grand Central Terminal in rush hour.

I just have to mention the Gordie Brown show at the Golden Nugget, which is in the old downtown section of the city. This is truly a must-see. It's laugh-a-second with this guy. An impressionist first and a singer second, Brown constantly pivots from one character to another with surprising accuracy. His Sammy Davis, Jr. impression, laced with George W.Bush one-liners, got a lot of giggles and guffaws. No one was spared, least of all Bill Clinton.

Gordie Brown and his irreverent iconoclastic rampage is Vegas at its best.

After two years in Vegas, I'm finally appreciating why Vegas has become the number one tourist destination in the world. No one here is saddled with inhibitions. Everybody is wearing a costume. If you go to Wynn, or the Palms, people walk around like they are all going to a prom or an important business meeting.

I walk around in my cowboy hat, cowboy belt, cowboy boots and shades all the time. Nobody pays attention to me. Those who come to Vegas and wear walking shorts and t-shirts and drink beer and margaritas while herding the kids past craps and poker tables are so used to the plastic costumed people in Vegas so me and my cowboy costume do not get a second look.

The current trend, though, appears to be no costume at all - in the swimming pools at the Palms, Mandalay Bay and all over the Las Vegas strip where the beautiful people and the crowds they attract frolic and eye each other under the Las Vegas sun.

"Fabulous" Las Vegas

I'm glad Jay Leno is not just fading into the sunset the way Johnny Carson did years ago, when he stepped aside to make way for Leno in the Tonight Show. I caught the TV ad for the new Leno prime time show that will debut next month. It was classic Leno.

Jay Leno is pretending to be a TV moderator asking contestants softball questions.

Jay asks: "Who lives in the Vatican?"

One of the contestants hits the buzzer first and answers: "Vatican-ites!"

"Wrong," Jay says, "I'll give you a hint. He wears a big hat"

Another contestant hits the buzzer first. "Abraham Lincoln," she shouts.

Jay is noted for his walkabouts, when he stands on a street corner in Los Angeles and interviews willing passersby. Some of the answers he gets are hilarious. He once asked a college student in LA when in world history was the ancient times. The reply he got from the college student was, "the 18th century."

Jay Leno's walkabouts are nearly as hysterical as the Philippine reality TV shows where the hosts ask simple, everyday questions of contestants in "Let's Make a Deal" copycat shows.

The host of one such Philippine show asked a woman contestant what she puts on her husband's eggs in the morning. She answered: "baby powder."

We all know what the educational standards are in the Philippines, but not everyone is aware how the educational standards in the U. S. have taken a straight-down nosedive over the last few decades. And nothing could have prepared us for the cover story of a recent Time Magazine issue. The cover is a shot of Las Vegas' iconic welcome sign, "Welcome to Fabulous Las Vegas," but the city's name is spelled "Less Vegas." The article in the inside pages is called, "Less Vegas."

The story was written by no less than the crackerjack Time writer Joel Stein, which automatically ranks the story in the pantheon of the Unbelievables. "What was Joel thinking?" I heard myself ask myself.

And that real estate agent, Ms. Boemio, why would she own up to doing unethical and illegal acts on the pages of any publication, let alone Time Magazine? For those who have not read "Less Vegas," Joel Stein writes that he and Ms. Boemio both broke into a bank-foreclosed house to see for themselves the extent of the damage to the house that previous squatting "occupants" had wrought.

There's a law against breaking and entering in this country, including in Las Vegas. It's considered a crime. So what was Joel Stein thinking writing about he and Ms. Boemio doing just that? How dumb could they both be?

And then there's Ms.Boemio's admission that she advises her customers to stop paying their mortgages on their underwater homes - properties that have mortgage balances that are more than the properties are worth. She further advices that her customers buy a foreclosed house on the cheap, move to the new house and let the old house go into foreclosure.

The customer's credit record is ruined, but at least the homeowner owns a house with a positive equity and a significant upside.

There may not be a law against Ms. Boemio - a real estate agent - advising her customers to stop making payments on those customers' upside-down properties, but it is clearly unethical. At least according to other real estate professionals in Las Vegas.

Ms. Boemio has been fired by her employer, is under investigation for alleged unethical practices and the Clark County prosecutor's office is looking into possible breaking and entering charges.

Because of Joel Stein's story, Ms. Boemio's career in real estate is over and she may soon be a defendant in a criminal case. Joel Stein may be subpoenaed as a witness and may in fact face charges himself.

What was Joel Stein thinking? Did he not know that he had a responsibility to protect sources of his stories? Even in cases where his source is not asking deep cover, he should have provided that cover.

In the old days, when Americans were still the smartest people on earth, no American journalist would have fumbled the ball the way Joel Stein clearly did. This is clearly a blunder bigger than chess masters commit when they are under intense pressure.

As a Vegan, I did not like the Time Magazine story, which seemingly predicts an impending monumental collapse of the city of Las Vegas and the danger that it will take decades before the city recovers - if it does recover.

I am half-amused, half-irritated by the cover of that Time issue - Welcome to Fabulous Less Vegas - which reminds me of one of the yuks that the old radio show Imus in the Morning got when a guest pointed out that army recruiters are worried about their male recruits whose favorite expression is "fabulous."

The Imus guest was talking about the "Don't Ask, Don't Tell" policy of the military towards gay men who were entering the Army. The Imus guest asked rhetorically, "If you are a recruiter for the Army and you ask the young man who is enlisting how his day has been and he answers, 'Fabulous' what would you do?"

Imus and his staff burst out laughing.

A great man has passed. I watched the Kennedy wake and Catholic Mass ceremonies last night and this morning and was amazed at how highly Americans think of the late Ted Kennedy. I knew that Ted was a great man, what I did not figure on hearing was that he may have been the greatest U.S. senator ever. His name is on more than 500 bills passed by the U.S. Senate and more than 1000 bills that became law had his imprint on them. He is being compared to the great Senator Daniel Webster, and when told of the comparison, Ted was said to have quipped, "Why, what did Daniel Webster accomplish?"

Most Filipinos owe an eternal debt of gratitude to Ted, as he was the author of the Immigration Department's policy of giving preference to "family reunification" cases for granting immigrant visas. It was the "family reunification" Kennedy mandate that allowed parents and unmarried siblings to follow those Filipinos who had managed to become immigrants in the U.S. In my case, I was able to bring my parents, three unmarried siblings and one married brother and his family to the U.S. after I became a citizen in 1974.

She Finally Kicked Cesar out of the House

In South Orange, New Jersey we used to have a spring cleaning day when residents could put out all their household discards on the berm and the town would pick them all up and send them away to trash collection centers. Every year, on the night before pickup day in the Spring, our berm was overflowing with discarded toys, broken furniture, appliances and other odds and ends that my first wife and I had decided we no longer needed.

On one such night before pickup day, my brother, his wife and sister-in-law came to our house to return a station wagon that my brother had borrowed from me.

On seeing the pile of discarded household items, my brother exclaimed: "Oh no, she finally kicked Cesar out."

My first wife and I were the least likely people to ever get married. We were exact opposites in most things, the only commonality was our love for literature. But even on that we eventually diverged. She continued to read voraciously, while I stopped reading. It was therefore just a matter of time before she would kick me out of the house and eventually out of her life.

I've been trying to go back to a comfort zone that I had left more than forty years ago when I immigrated from the Philippines to the U.S. At first I thought it would be easy, since my childhood friends still looked the same - only a little older - and seemingly welcoming me with open arms.

But much has changed over the years. I'm no longer the same guy who left long ago, and no matter how hard I try to fit in, I'm just not like my friends anymore.

I am passionate about my politics, am a liberal-progressive now to the core. Shortly after my graduation from high school, my father lost his fortune to politics - dirty politics - and for a few years I knew what it was like to have a father who was broke and to be poor. I am therefore attracted to the causes that help the poor, the downtrodden, especially here in America, and most of such people are usually either African-American or Hispanic.

It has made no difference how much I earn, I have always identified with the teeming masses, the "milling, moiling miasma" of the underclass. (The phrase in quotes is a borrowed phrase from a campus friend I admired when we were both in college at La Salle in the Philippines.)

I am perfectly happy in the U.S. There is a place for me here. There are tens of millions, if not hundreds of millions of Americans who similarly passionately pursue the goal of helping minorities and the downtrodden lift themselves up by the bootstraps. There's the billionaire George Soros and MoveOn.Org. There's the Clintons, Al Gore, Bill Gates, Barbara Streisand. There's the Brangelina tandem. There are celebrities galore who are devoting a good chunk of their leisure time to helping the disadvantaged.

When I take that same passion for the underclass to my birth country and to the friends I left behind and who would be my social circle if I finally decide to pull the trigger on my Philippine retirement, all I get are blank stares. My friends, who are very much a part of the elite in the Philippines, cannot understand why I care more about the downtrodden than about their feelings.

In a country that runs on the culture of exploitation of the masses, it is very difficult to find among the elite the same passion for proletariat politics that we liberals in the U.S. eat, drink and breathe.

While my friends have not changed over the past forty years, I am already light years away from them. As members of the elite - the ruling class - in the Philippines, my friends are partly responsible for the status quo. I don't think that they have consciously contributed to the problems that beset the Philippines, in fact they probably have genuinely struggled to be at one time or another a part of the solution.

But the Philippines is a basket case. At some point one has to decide: do I continue to knock my head against that immovable object, or do I give in and achieve an accommodation? The question is moot, because most of my childhood friends are retired. At 10 p.m. they are getting ready to go to bed. They have grandchildren who remind them every day that they are old. In a culture that accords the greatest respect to older people, they feel comfortable in being old.

In the U.S. where everybody wants to stay young, you feel good if you go through life without any major medical issues and can still do what young people do. People here respect you more if you constantly defy the aging process. and not give in.

On a personal basis, my friends are still my friends. We are friends forever. But we are very different now. I still feel that my greatest work is ahead of me. I am trying to make a difference not only in the U.S. - which is my home now - but also in the Philippines, which I feel needs my help.

Most of my friends are just retired, or about to retire, and enjoying their golden years.

Talk about my wife putting me out along with the discarded household items on the berm. Recently I tried to post a message to my high school Internet group. It would not accept my post and when I checked, yahoogroups told me that I was not a member of the group.

They finally kicked me out of the house.

It was like going to a Thanksgiving dinner and finding out you had to eat in the porch and not at the dining room table with everybody else.

It was only a matter of time before my friends would decide that I can no longer be one of them, at least not with my noisy and peace-shattering politics and worldview, which drive me every day of my life and which drives some of them crazy.

It was only a matter of time before my friends would say enough is enough, we don't want to hear your opinions, we don't care what you think - and shut me up.

I want to change my world, they are happy and content with their world. And none of them want to hear about the health care reform in the U.S., the debate that is currently raging in my new home country. None of them want to hear that the Philippines sits on a social powder keg.

There are two images about Home that readily come to mind. There's Michael Buble's beloved hometown in the song "Home." And then there's Thomas Wolfe's Home in "You can't go home again."

When Adam Takes a Bite off Eve's Apple

I love taking long drives with my son. That's when I find out how much he knows about life. I realized this week that my son really doesn't know anything about sex. Zilch. Nada.

"Why are people mad when two gay people live together, dad?" he asked me on our way home from San Diego. Paul sometimes sneaks up behind me while I'm watching MSNBC and CNN, so he is aware of all the political issues being discussed on TV.

My wife had to cut short her vacation with us in San Diego because she had to be back at the office. I had to drive the car back - 330 miles - from San Diego to Las Vegas, with Paul yakking it up behind me all through the trip, except when he decided to take a power nap sprawled on the back seat with his mouth wide open.

"Because it's unnatural for two people of the same sex to live together, Paul," I replied.

"Why? They're just living together," he retorted.

"I'll be darned," I thought to myself, "when should I tell Paul about the birds and the bees? When do I explain to him why he has a penis and why it's always hard in the morning?" My wife thinks that ten is too young, that we should wait until he's older. How much older?

I can't wait to tell my son about girls. He still hates girls, though I'm quite sure that there's a stirring there somewhere. My wife and I often catch him playing with his thing in the morning while watching Cartoon Network. Once he asked us why his penis was hard in the mornings.

His favorite show on Cartoon Network is "iCarly." In fact, he has to make sure that he is home at 8 p.m. on Saturdays so he can watch "iCarly."

"Do you like Carly, Paul" I asked him last Saturday.

He looked at me with that half-threatening smile and the next thing I knew I got a punch on my right triceps. That stung. God, this little guy can punch. In his mind, he has already warned me against teasing him about girls so every time I tease him I get smacked once. Lately, his punches have started to sting.

Is there an advantage in early learning about the role sex plays in the relationship between the sexes?

In my case, my parents never had to sit me down and explain to me why boys and girls are built differently.

I must have been six, going on seven, when I walked down the staircase of the two-story home that my parents rented in Pasay City, the Philippines. As I came down the last few steps, the maids - I vaguely remember that we had two maids at the time - were standing next to the kitchen stove and shushing me. They half-whispered, "Nag pa-pam-pam." (They're doing the pam-pam thing.)

I didn't know what "pam-pam" meant. Hell, I was only six.

The maids quietly motioned me to the front end of what must have been the living room. Beyond the living room, in the front part of the house, was a room that my parents had rented to a couple. I had no concept of how old people were; to me, they were just adults. The man, whom I had never before seen, was an officer in the Philippine Army. It was right after the Second World War and there were mopping up operations against the Japanese stragglers in the Philippines. The man was always away on missions.

I saw that my older brother was already peering through a hole in the wall of the bedroom. I nudged my brother aside and took a look. There was another hole in the wall, so he just slid towards that other hole.

I saw the man on top of his wife and they were going at it violently, in rhythm.

That, my friends, was the start of my sex education.

Years later, I figured out why people in the Philippines referred to the act as "pam-pam." It was an allusion to the "pom-pom" girls who with their wide open arms and legs welcomed the GI Joes who had liberated the Philippines from the Japanese.

I often wonder if I should sit Paul down already and have that all-important chat with him. Some of the kids in his Track and Field club obviously know about sex already. One of the sub-bantam boys (six to eight years old) was horsing around on the team bus with one of the older teammates when he made a hole out of his left thumb and index finger. He then thrust his right middle finger into the hole he created, kept thrusting and laughed hard.

There are girls on that track team and they were on the team bus with us, so I guessed that the seven-year-old kid was talking about what he would do to one of the girls.

My son saw what the seven-year-old did but had no reaction.

This is a conundrum. Should I teach my son about sex? Should I wait until he gets sex education through his school? I want to sit him down soon because I am impatient for him to emerge from that stage where all boys hate girls (he'll be eleven in January), but my wife is terrified at the prospect of him knowing about his sexuality. I tell my wife that Paul might fall in with the wrong crowd and learn about sex the wrong way. She said, "what are you worried about? You're his nanny. You know everything that happens to him 24/7." Good point.

I think she wants him to lose his innocence at a much later age than his peers so he can enjoy his childhood longer. And she wants to hang on to him as her little son for as long as she can. But, he's starting to rebel. When she calls the house and Paul picks up, Paul can't wait to put down the phone and go back to his video game. I don't exactly approve of video games being the focus of his life, but at least he is now asserting that his life is separate from his parents'. That's a good sign.

Oh, by the way, about San Diego. It was actually my wife's first choice as our destination city after we sold our house in South Orange, New Jersey in 2007. There were very few houses for rent in San Diego at the time and the houses for sale were way overpriced. Las Vegas was our second choice. We moved to Las Vegas because there were lots of rentals and the houses were already starting to come down in price.

We knew that in another year, we could snap up a nice bargain in Las Vegas.

My wife and I both loved San Diego. We loved the harbor, the many sailboats and speedboats that lay in anchor in the Bay. We loved the beach on Coronado island, the world famous Imperial Beach right next to the Hotel del Coronado. Paul absolutely loved the beach. He didn't mind the cool water - kids love the cold surf that adults simply can't stand - and I had to pry him loose. He would have stayed in the water all day if I didn't insist that he came out.

Sea World is unbelievable - especially the night shows. If you're in San Diego, you must go to Sea World. The Zoo is great for the kids, but it's brutal on old folks' legs and knees. Thank God for the escalators in the middle of the trees, or how else could old folks get back up after going down the rolling hills of the San Diego Zoo?

We took in a tour of San Diego and Coronado Island on the Old Town tourist bus and squeezed in a trip to Legoland in Carlsbad, 30 miles north of San Diego. I slept on a bench in Legoland while Paul and his mom were two kids exploring and going on rides.

It was in the low 80s during the day and in the 70s at night. I caught the TV at the lobby as we were walking back to our hotel room. The weatherman mentioned in glee: "It was 112 degrees this afternoon in Vegas, folks."

More Embarrassing Moments

I got a few calls telling me that the post titled "Ten Most Embarrassing Moments in Cesar Lumba's Life" was hilarious. One of the callers was my friend, Ben Pangilinan from New Jersey, who said he thought my wife Paulita is an even better writer than me and writes funnier stories.

My sister-in-law asked why my stay in a New Jersey hospital in 1989 was not included in the all-time best. I told her that it was originally on the list but I edited it out. I also edited out a portion of my wife's original post, which I felt might gross some readers out.

"But you took away the punchline," she said. "That was the part that really made you look hysterical."

Because of these developments, I have revisited the Ten Most Embarrassing and am putting back the sections that I removed from the original and adding an 11th embarrassing moment, which would have been one of the ten. Since there were only ten in the original, one of those that were in the published version must not have been in the original, right? You are correct. The tenth most embarrassing - the one about me as a 13 year old blowing a bubble out of my nostril - was not in the original list made up by Paulita.

The section that was edited out of Paulita's submission (from I've Got You Under My Skin):

(Background: I sang Frank Sinatra's "I've Got You Under My Skin" in front of about 300 people, mainly alumni of De La Salle University in Manila, and found out after I stopped singing that I had sung out of sync with the background music. I had already stopped singing but the music was still going.)

That night, Cesar went to bed still depressed about his performance on stage. He had a hard time falling asleep, while I was out as soon as I closed my eyes. I was tired.

I woke up in the middle of the night and saw Cesar sitting on the bed, apparently having awakened from a nightmare. He was screaming: "Nakakahiya! Hindi na ako kakanta uli sa stage." (It was humiliating, I'm not going to ever sing on stage again.)

During the next two weeks, he woke up in the middle of the night at least three times with the same resolution. Never again, he would say, never again would he sing on stage, especially when he could not hear the melody.

I told him he should forget about I've Got You Under My Skin. "I'm sure people have forgotten about that already."

I noticed, though, occasionally he would make that smacking noise with his lips, something that he does when he remembers a faux pas or something that he finds embarrassing.

More times than not, I am correct when I say, "you remembered 'I've Got You Under My Skin' again."

11, was originally 10. The bullet-riddled briefs. One evening in 1989, Cesar was looking for briefs to wear after his shower. Most of his briefs were in the wash, so I handed him a pair of briefs that he was no longer wearing because they were full of bullet holes.

I said, "Why don't you wear these, since you are going to bed anyway and nobody will see you wearing them." So he put on those briefs.

That night, he suffered his first atrial fibrillation episode. His heart was beating fast and irregularly. I rushed him to a hospital emergency room.

He was given some medication to put his heart back in rhythm and a Xanax to calm him down. After a couple of hours, his heart went back into sinus (normal) rhythm. A pretty, young Filipina nurse went into his room to check him out, to make sure that he had had no heart attack, or swollen feet, etc.

The nurse asked him to lift his right leg. Cesar was wide awake already and he remembered that he was wearing the briefs that I had handed over to him. Cesar looked at me, his face clearly showing embarrassment. He rolled to his side and lifted his leg. Meanwhile, with his two hands he was covering his crotch. The nurse examined his right leg, laid it down gently and said, "Now let's see your left leg."

The nurse was already in on the farce. She had seen that Cesar's briefs was shot full of holes and was good-naturedly needling him.

Cesar squirmed and laid on his right side, lifting his left leg for the nurse to see. The nurse was openly laughing, so was I, and Cesar lay there with a quizzical smile on his face.

After the nurse left, Cesar turned to me and said, "Hayop ka, bakit mo ipinasuot sa akin yung sira-sira kong briefs." (You animal, why did you make me wear these tattered briefs?)

I will be on vacation for a week and won't be able to acknowledge your comments if you send them by email. If you wish to comment on this or any other post, please make your comments here on the blog itself. Don't email me, or call me.

I hope you agree with Paulita that if I had included the sections I had edited out of her post, the Ten Most Embarrassing post would have been funnier.