Saturday, June 11, 2011

Plunder and the Philippines



1972 was a special year for me. It was the year I was supposed to go back to the Philippines. It was the year I was to reclaim my destiny. Five years. Five years was all I had given myself. Seattle was lovely, especially in the Summer and in the Fall. But it was not my home. My home was 6000 miles away - on the biggest island in an island chain in the Pacific. I had given myself five years in my new home, Seattle, and then I would go back - my family in tow - and make something of my life. I was convinced that someday I would be an important man in the Philippines, but to accomplish that I needed to go back.

It was getting a bit late. I was already 31, but I knew that if I was too old, I was only too old by about five years. And what's five years compared to the rest of a man's life?

Psychologically I was already back in the Philippines. I wrote one of my childhood friends that Seattle had become too toxic for me. I resented going to Dick's Burgers to picnic on burgers and french fries. My taste buds yearned for tinapa (smoked fish) and salted eggs mixed with sliced tomatoes. To me, that was a picnic. Not those french fries. Not those burgers. And I wanted to eat fried rice and tuyo (salted fish) on the mornings.

Everybody who knew me knew that my ultimate goal was to go back to the Philippines. I told my bosses that, I told my friends, I told my wife.

Tragedy struck. The legitimately elected (elected by landslide) President, Ferdinand Marcos, declared martial law, jailed all his political opponents, including the student leaders at the University of the Philippines and other universities. Some of the jailed leaders were my friends.

1972 was a bad year to go back. 1973, 1974, etc. were not a good time to go back. But my soul was already back in the Philippines, stuck and in limbo. I had already lost interest in forging a career in the U.S. I went through a string of jobs - good jobs, because I was terrific in job interviews - but I was unhappy.

I had what in retrospect was a delusion of grandeur. I thought of myself as a man of destiny, that I had no business being in the U.S., that my true home was the Philippines.

But I could not make it my real home because I did not trust myself. I was convinced that I would eventually end up in jail if I went back because I was not one who would keep my mouth shut if I saw injustice being done to my fellow Filipinos.

So I suppressed my dream as the calendar swiftly turned, day after day, season after season, year after year. Till I woke up one day and decided that America was my home and there was no going back.

Though I was never a victim of Marcos' atrocities, I was in a very real sense also his victim. He robbed me of my dream. It was a dream that would not be replaced by any other dreams for many years. I walked around, defeated without having even started. A man with no dreams.

1986 was prolonged delirium. The country finally unchained. By a woman, by a housewife. Cory Aquino was the widow of a murdered hero. Greatness appeared to be in store for a people long neglected but ever exploited. By outside colonizers. By the elites in society. By nearly everyone who could afford to buy a plane ticket to take one to this island chain. The whole world had watched the toppling of a hated and despised dictator, his dowager wife, his palace guards. The whole world learned from Filipinos how to topple dictators and dictatorial regimes. Shortly after, the Berlin Wall came down amid a cacophony of hammers. The Iron Curtain was shredded. Even China was taken to the brink by peaceful demonstrators, who had molded their tactics after the People Power revolution in the Philippines.

Meanwhile, did the Filipino people really win? The hero's widow proved powerless against the mutineers. Except for top brass, the military never really accepted her and let her know in many different ways. The widow was beleaguered, besieged by her many foes. To add insult, there were rumors that her relatives and cronies were as pigs in a sty.

The old power structures during the Marcos years started streaming back into the Philippines. They were back in force, reclaiming the wealth, prestige and power they had enjoyed. Even the highly successful Fidel Ramos presidency would not prevent the gradual return of Marcos elements back into Philippine elite society.

By the time the actor-turned-politician, Joseph Estrada, was elected President, the whole Marcos clan and nearly all his cronies, were back in power. The message to the Filipino people? It's OK to plunder the government, to murder the people, to steal from political opponents because the Filipino people are very forgiving. Either that, or they have no real power. Or they are too stupid to know how to use their inherent power as the supreme ruler of their land.

So the Joker, Estrada, himself plundered the treasury, fearing no downside. Sure enough, though convicted of plunder, Estrada was pardoned by his successor, Gloria Macapagal Arroyo.

Arroyo, herself, feared no prosecution because she owned the wheels of justice. The Ombudsman was a classmate of her husband's at the Ateneo and would never prosecute her if she was caught stealing from the blind to give money to her friends in the illegal numbers business. Arroyo felt she was above the law, and by extension, her husband too.

Now comes President Noynoy Aquino, the hero's and the widow's son. He was swept into office by the accumulation of rage and hope of a people that was fed up with all the far-too-imperfect, far-too-fallen leaders who had masqueraded as the people's saviors. All the while focused on the country's meager resources. How these leaders went about appropriating for themselves a percentage of all major government contracts was a study in genius. There are many different ways powerful people could make money on government contracts, and all the leaders knew all those ways.

The jury is still out on President Noynoy. So far all we have seen is shadow boxing. No prosecutions, only threats of prosecution. No judgment day, only talk of the people exacting revenge upon their exploiters.

One very disturbing and maybe very telling indication that President Noynoy's administration may yet be same old, same old was the recent appointment of Vice-President Binay to head the committee to decide on the request of Senator Bongbong Marcos - yes, the late dictator's son - to bury his late father with full military honors at the Libingan ng mga Bayani (Cemetery for Heroes). Because of the uproar over this suggestion, VP Binay has made a counter-offer, to bury the late dictator not in the Cemetery for Heroes but in an Ilocos Region cemetery with full military honors.

What!...? Full military honors? Is this how dictators are treated by countries with a conscience and with high standards of morality?

The late Marcos, to begin with, was granted asylum in an island paradise - Honolulu - while most other dictators ended up in unglamorous cities to live out their retirement years. Cities such as Riyadh, Cairo, Asuncion, Paraguay, Karina,Zimbabwe, Santiago, Chile. Marcos, of all the dictators, ended up in paradise to live out his retirement years. And now that he is dead, he is to be given full military honors?

Ano siya, sinuswerte? (What? He's the luckiest man alive - or dead.)

I don't know VP Binay personally. I know of him, that he was a good administrator while serving as Makati's mayor. But this suggestion to bury Marcos with full military honors - even if it's done in Ilocos and not at the Cemetery for Heroes - is a travesty. It makes a mockery of the People Power revolution that toppled Marcos in 1986. It sullies the memory of those who had been murdered by Marcos's secret police and military. It sends the wrong message to the people: that Filipinos are so forgiving that the man who had ruled with an iron fist, had plundered the Philippine treasury, had murdered and incarcerated so many innocents, deserved forgiveness.

Why did Binay even think of making that suggestion? Was he gunning for national reconciliation? Is reconciliation more important than the Filipino soul? The Filipino soul had been wounded by this man, Marcos, and no reconciliation is possible without the continuing and proper punishment meted out to this man. Others have suggested that the family of Marcos and his cronies should be barred from leadership positions going forward. I'm not getting into that, since that is an altogether different question. Suffice it to say that if Marcos is buried incognito, with no honors, that should take care of the future of the Marcos children. None of them should ever be allowed to ascend to the Presidency and a Marcos incognito burial will get that done.

Reconciliation is not possible without justice. The relatives of Marcos' victims have not been adequately compensated. Many have received no compensation. No apology has been received. Marcos's heirs and cronies are high-flying and thumbing their noses at the country. Meanwhile, a greater percentage of Filipinos are dirt-poor and in desperate straits than before Marcos became President. Our economy is in a state of arrested development while our Southeast Asian neighbors are overachieving, thanks in large part to the lack of development - even negative development - during the Marcos years.

And now Binay is suggesting that this Marcos guy deserves full military honors?

This, folks, is why the government's treasury is being plundered. President Noynoy will probably break the chain of Presidents who have seen the government treasury plundered, but when he is gone and someone else (Binay, Roxas, etc.) is in power, the treasury will be plundered again. Why? Because the message is clear: if you are president, you can plunder, murder, pillage and maybe even rape all you want and the Filipino people will forgive you. You might even be given full military honors when you die.

And this is the country I had dreamed of going back to, for which I had sacrificed my early years in America? What was I thinking?

Oh, but I will go back. I will keep going back. Probably not for full-time retirement, but for significant chunks of time. It is not the Filipino people's fault that they are gullible or too forgiving. Filipinos have known only exploitation. It's already in their genes. They will be exploited, fooled, their treasury plundered, and they will still smile and shriek and sing the Wow-wow-wee theme song. They are a lovable people and easy to please. They seek to be pleased. With the slightest compliment. With the minutest of favors.

This is why plunder will always be open for business.

15 comments:

  1. From Aquilino Alcantara by email:


    yes and yes ... it is a false sense of: utang na loob to the rich and powerful ...

    but once a pinoy is an equal to a fellow pinoy, the problem starts because then, pinoys will not respect a fellow pinoy ... there lies our ethnic problem ...

    ReplyDelete
  2. From Ramon Franco by email:

    YES and more!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  3. From Dr. Tony Aguado by email:

    Perhaps it is because in practical terms it does not make a difference to living conditions?

    ReplyDelete
  4. Hi Tony,

    Does this mean that as a people we have already given up?

    ReplyDelete
  5. From Jerry Lynch by email:

    I suspect the answer to your question is YES.

    Jerry Lynch

    ReplyDelete
  6. From Arthur Alvendia by email:


    The Reign of Philippine Presidents and Institutional Systems

    Arthur Alvendia


    Assessing history depending on who the President was, has been a practical and popular method. After all they make the critical choices that can make, unmake or perpetuate the prevailing social systems. The flaw is the analysis stops there and fails to see the institutional system that was already there in the first place, that largely pre- determines what a leader can do, if he is able to see it and is willing and capable to make and implement the systemic choices that can make the difference. The societal institutional system refers to the structures of power (political-economic) that have been translated into organizations, legal system, social and cultural mechanisms, government policies and programs.

    Marcos recognized that the long standing feudal oligarchy is the culprit, which had molded and defined society institutional system which governed as well limited the growth of Philippine society and continues to impose the inequitable participation of the masses in that growth. That institutional system was premised on the ideologies of democracy and capitalism, and as such considered sacred and sacrosanct. To bring systemic changes, he had to cross the line of order established by freedom and economic rationality. For "this sin" Marcos has been demonized and called the enemy of freedom and the people. Yet it remains incontrovertible that under his regime, economic growth and its benefits reached the most Filipinos as is still remembered by the masses and documented by economic reviews.
    (continued next)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Continuation of Arthur Alvendia's comments:


    Cory brought back the form of democracy. This brought back political freedom, as well as the oligarchy's power and hold on the political-economic institutional system. She reinstalled brought the same oligarchic powers (ie., the "elite victims" of martial law) and their institutional system, restoring the monopolies with the new clothes of "privatization" and neoclassical market economics. Happy days were here again.

    Ramos brought reinstalled the economic power of the local oligarchy and unified it with the Western world's globalization juggernaut. Sure there was progress, but it remained with the few elite. Did he not see that installing an institutional system that "Leveled the playing field -- only benefitted the Big and strong, implicitly discriminates against the mass of micro-small producers that comprise 98% of his economic constituents. Of course this meant political support from the rich and powerful local and international. He sold out to the globalizers and won praises from the establishment, opened the floodgates to market invaders in the name of consumer welfare.
    ERAP had the intuitive insight and right heart for the masses, but he was surrounded by the same technocracy of Ramos (who had just been acclaimed for his so called economic progress), and so he followed their advice, and thus maintained the hold of the same political-economic oligarchy. Too bad he had his sights on the right thing – the people, but he did not see or could not cope with the subtle structures and barriers of the institutional system. Too much to memorize?

    Gloria combined all that she learned from past presidents on how to maintain and benefit from political and economic power, using the prevailing Institutional System in the name of Good Governance. She was a technical master of the rule of due process, the rules of evidence, and political patronage. She continued the free market fundamentalist thinking of globalization ie., – privatization, unbridled competition, follow the market, limiting economic management to macro-fundamentals -- which has done nothing for the marginalized masses, only deepening poverty.

    Now Pnoy comes to ensure some more “good governance” by removing corrupt people hopefully the institutionalized culture of corruption as well. On the economic front – he remains a fine disciple of the globalization religion and the institutional system that goes with it. He has maintained a neutral distance from the market workings – limiting his intervention to Conditional Cash Transfers as a palliative response to poverty. What happened to people empowerment? -- Stifled by the” good governance (of an institutional system)” syndrome which has remained unchallenged and unseen as the real enemy and the barrier to true people empowerment. People still trust him, but will he have the eyes to see and the heart to make the choices necessary?

    ReplyDelete
  8. From Russ Turla by email:

    Hello Chay - someone once said to me: "If there is a problem, there must be a solution. But, if there is no solution, then there must be a problem!" I am resigned and & I don't even think any more about what has/had become of our beautiful "Mutya ng Silangnganan". What's the use? Whoever becomes the president, it's business as usual! SAD! SAD! SAD!

    (p.s. In view of the transparent truth, in your opening question, that is why so many & I believe that even Mao Zedong's simple idea i.e. "Gapas Damo System" -mowing the lawn so that new grass will grow - will not work, because, 1) noone there is a brave Rizal willing to sacrifice his life to lead & do it 2) again, because, of your powerful opening question. Of course, the obvious answer to that question, is, sad to say, 'YES. IT IS IN OUR GENES'. What say you?"

    ReplyDelete
  9. Russ,

    Since you worked at UNDP, you must have been confronted daily with the truism, "If there is a problem, there must be a solution." If not, then why have a U.N. Development Program at all?

    If we accept as fact that forgiving tyrants and plunderers is embedded in Filipino genes, then what is the solution? How do the country's leaders bring about progress? How can the Filipino people eradicate plunder and corruption at the highest levels if they genetically are predisposed to accept those two curses on governance as par for the course?

    What did other countries do? There was widespread corruption in the banana republics. Military juntas came and went. Convulsive solutions were tried and implemented, and now, voila! it's the 21st century and things are beginning to look up in some of those former banana republics.

    Let's look at Costa Rica. This country is the most progressive among all Central American states. Its tourism (thanks to American dollars) is first-rate. Its governance is the model of the region. Corruption at least on the surface is under control.

    A Wikipedia article points out that Costa Rica went through periods of convulsive change, was ruled by a dictator and a succession of military juntas before it finally found its way. It also abolished its armed forces and became forever rid of military leaders threatening a coup d'etat.

    The point of all this is that Costa Ricans were willing to start over, start from scratch. They knew that they were headed in the wrong direction, so they got on the right track, reinvented themselves and are now the envy of other countries in Latin America.

    Finally, you read my book, Out of the Misty Sea We Must, and in that book I have outlined the steps that Filipino leaders can take to remake the Philippines. The country, as presently constituted, is either adrift or going to pot.

    Thanks for your comments.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Hi Art,

    I'm glad you posted this comment. People have long forgotten that when martial law was first instituted, it was a huge success. Crime rates plummeted, people felt safe in the streets, Filipinos felt a palpable sense that the country was indeed on a journey towards greater prosperity and social justice.

    Marcos had all the right intentions. His legacy for the most part, however, is the brutality, the greed, the corruption of absolute power, the billions of dollars stolen from the Philippine treasury. On balance, the country's prospects plummeted during his reign, erasing his early successes. Even to the very forgiving average Filipino, Marcos' kleptocracy knew no bounds.

    Your point, that the Philippine social and government institutions mold the leaders and not the other way around is well taken. In the final analysis, Filipinos deserve the succession of governments they've had.

    This is why we who know better must remake society. Unfortunately, we are not going to be around forever, so I've written this book, Out of the Misty Sea We Must, which is a blueprint for remaking the Philippines. Filipinos must start from scratch. What they have now has not worked, will never work.

    Of course, President Noynoy could still surprise all of us and launch the Philippines on the right track. I doubt it, he doesn't seem to know where to start. He should read my book.

    Chay

    ReplyDelete
  11. From Lynn Abad Santos by email:


    CHAY,

    NICE PIECE.

    WHAT YEAR DID YOU LEAVE MANILA? I ASK THIS QUESTION BECAUSE YOU WERE RIGHT, FOR THE FIRST 2 1/2 YEARS AFTER SEPT. 22 1972 MARCOS RULED BY COMMITTEE. HE HAD ALL THE TECHNOCRATS WHO WERE HAPPY TO BE RID OF THE POLITICS, AND RED TAPE SUGGESTING SO MANY MODELS FOR STREAMLINING THE GOVERNMENT AND THE ECONOMY

    BUT AT SOME POINT THE SPOUSE BEGAN TO ASK " WHAT IS IN IT FOR US? WE TOOK A BIG RISK DECLARING MARTIAL LAW?" ONE OF THE FIRST SCANDALS ASIDE FROM SEQUESTERING MERALCO FOR KOKOY, AS WITH PHILAMLIFE WHEN "PAPA CAROL WAS PROHIBITED FROM FLYING BACK TO MANILA WHEN HE WAS CAUGHT IN THE U.S WHEN MARTIAL LAW WAS DECLARED .WAS THE JAPAN WAR REPARATIONS YEARLY ALLOTMENT.

    THE REPARATIONS WERE SUPPOSED TO BE IN HEAVY MACHINERY FOR PUBLIC WORKS PROJECTS NOT ISUZU BELLET METROCOM POLICE CARS AND HINO-LOVE-BUSES YOU DON'T NEED MUCH IMAGINATION WHY IT WAS CONVERTED. A CABINET MEMBER RESIGNED BECAUSE HE WAS RESPONSIBLE FOR ACCOUNTING FOR THE REPARATIONS

    THEN CAME THE SUGAR CARTEL FEVER, AS IF WE COULD EVER BECOME A MAJOR PLAYER IN ANY COMMODITY - TRYING TO EMULATE THE OIL POTENTATES. WELL THAT WENT BELLY UP, AND P 1 B GOVERNMENT MONEY ( 1974-1975 ) WAS USED TO COVER IT UP

    BUT BEFORE ANYONE THINKS IT WAS SHEER GENIUS, THERE WAS A MORE DISGUSTING REASON FOR THE ABILITY TO ACCUMULATE SO MANY ASSETS.

    MANY OF THE CEOs OF THE OLD ESTABLISHED FOREIGN COMPANIES SAW AN OPPORTUNITY TO MAKE MONEY. THEY WOULD GO TO MALACANANG, OFFERING THEIR COMPANIES TO MARCOS FOR NOTHING MORE THAN ZERO DOWN, ASSUME MORTGAGE. THEY WOULD SUGGEST A REFI OF THE COMPANIES, PULL OUT THEIR EQUITY, AS FAR AS COULD BE SHOULDERED BY THE PRESENT CASH FLOW. NATURALLY THAT MEANT THE DBP WOULD GRANT THE LOAN, AND WHO ELSE COULD TELL THE DBP TO GRANT IT

    THEN THESE CEOs WOULD TURN AROUND, TALK TO THE MAJORITY STOCK HOLDERS PRETENDING THAT THEY WERE GETTING SIGNALS FROM MALACANANG SO IT WAS BETTER TO LET GO WHILE THEY COULD GET SOMETHING.

    PLAYING BOTH SIDES AGAINST THE MIDDLE. THAT IS WHEN MARCOS REALIZED THAT WITHOUT DOING ANYTHING BY SIMPLY MONOPOLIZING POWER HE COULD IN FACT CONTROL COMMERCE.. I WILL LEAVE IT TO YOU TO FIGURE OUT WHO THE COLLABORATORS WERE. THE POOR OWNERS OF THE FIRMS NEVER HOW THEY WERE "PLAYED" TILL AFTER MARCOS WAS DEPOSED.

    SOMEONE SAID FILIPINOS ARE SPINELESS BALIMBINGS BECAUSE THAT IS WHAT IT TOOK TO SURVIVE 300 YEARS OF COLONIZATION. IN SHORT WE REALLY HAVE NO IDENTITY. WE MIGHT THINK WE DO, BUT IN FACT WE DO NOT AS EVIDENCED BY OUR FRACTIONAL POLITICS, AND SOCIAL ALLIANCES.

    IN ILOCOS MARCOS IS STILL A GOD. THAT MEANS ILOCANOS COULD CARE LESS ABOUT THE WELFARE OF FELLOW FILIPINOS OUTSIDE THEIR PROVINCE. NOW HOW CAN YO CALL THAT A COUNTRY?

    LYNN

    ReplyDelete
  12. From Manny Almario by email:

    Marcos isn't a hero so he has no business being buried in the Libingan ng mga Bayani.

    He should be buried in his family's own property where is loyalists can delude themselves about his fake heroism all they want.

    God bless!

    ReplyDelete
  13. From Angel by email:

    Benevolent dictators have a bad habit of turning into malevolent dictators, and either type can be an incompetent dictator. :-)

    I don't quite get Cesar. If P-Noy is clueless and Cesar has all the answers, and If P-Noy can learn to run the country just by reading Cesar's book, why can't Cesar just get his arse off his writing chair and come here and show how it is done? Maybe he can be elected dictator.

    Angel

    ReplyDelete
  14. Hi Angel,

    This is nothing new. The Philippines is in the shape it's in because its leaders have not had the proper vision. They are either incapable of great vision or are prevented from having one for political reasons.

    The people with ideas are those who are not constrained by politics. I am one of those.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Hi, I came across your site and wasn’t able to get an email address to contact you. Would you please consider adding a link to my website on your page. Please email me back and we'll talk about it.

    Thanks!

    Hailey William
    haileyxhailey@gmail.com

    ReplyDelete